10 Key indicators for evaluating workplace productivity

Written by

Kimberly Chan-Boodram 

Published on

March 12, 2024
All ArticlesPerformance Management and Appraisal

Workplace productivity refers to the efficiency and effectiveness with which tasks, projects, and goals are accomplished within a work environment. It encompasses the output or results achieved relative to the resources, time, and effort invested. Workplace productivity can be measured in various ways, such as output per hour worked, revenue generated per employee, completion of tasks within a deadline or any other Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) put in place to measure. Such indicators differ from organisation to organisation depending on the purpose.

Some factors that contribute to workplace productivity include:

  • Employee Engagement
  • Effective Communication
  • Availability of Resources
  • Workplace Culture
  • Goal-to-Person Alignment
  • Time Management
  • Continuous Improvement
  • Quality Assurance Systems

Overall, workplace productivity is crucial for the success and competitiveness of organisations, as it directly impacts profitability, customer satisfaction, and employee morale.

image showing concept of workplace productivity

Here are ten key indicators for evaluating workplace productivity:

  1. Output per Employee: This metric measures the amount of work produced by each employee over a given period. It could be quantified in terms of units produced, tasks completed, or projects delivered.
  2. Revenue per Employee: This metric evaluates the revenue generated by each employee within a set time frame. It helps assess how efficiently employees are contributing to the organisation’s financial goals whether directly or indirectly.
  3. Utilisation Rate: This measures the percentage of time employees spend on productive tasks versus non-productive activities such as meetings, administrative tasks, or idle time. A higher utilisation rate indicates better productivity. This may also require additional tracking systems, software etc. to support this. Business Process Mapping (BPM) exercised and job/task evaluations can also support the prioritisation lists.
  4. Quality of Work: Assessing the quality of work produced by employees is crucial. This could involve evaluating customer satisfaction, error rates, or adherence to quality standards. Quality of work also refers to the presentation of the work.
  5. Deadlines and completion times: This metric tracks how long it takes for tasks or projects to be completed from start to finish. Monitoring time-to-completion helps identify bottlenecks and inefficiencies in processes. The deadline is the set time given to complete the task however the completion time actually assesses the time taken to complete it.
  6. Employee Absenteeism and Turnover Rates: High absenteeism and turnover rates can indicate underlying issues affecting productivity, such as low morale, poor working conditions, or inadequate support. Most leaders directly associate these two metrics with productivity.
  7. Employee Engagement: Engaged employees are typically more productive. Surveys, feedback mechanisms, and retention rates can provide insights into employee engagement levels. This should be periodic and not one-off, as engagement levels can change rapidly especially if the environment is ever-changing as most are.
  8. Cost of Labour: Analysing the cost of labour relative to productivity metrics can help organisations identify areas for cost savings or process improvements. This also seems to be impacted by external forces, for example, the increase of the minimum wage in Trinidad and Tobago.
  9. Employee Feedback and Suggestions: Soliciting feedback from employees about their work environment, processes, and tools can provide valuable insights into areas for improvement and potential productivity barriers. Feedback should not only be solicited but utilised or at least considered in key decision-making.
  10. Benchmarking: Comparing productivity metrics against industry standards or competitors can help organisations gauge their performance and identify areas where they excel or lag. The challenge with this within the region is that for specific organisations, data/metrics etc… are not available, and in some cases, there are no organisations of similar size or within the same sector.
    By tracking and analysing these key indicators, organisations can gain valuable insights into their productivity levels and identify opportunities for improvement to drive better business outcomes.
    While all these metrics serve as key indicators for evaluating workplace productivity, it is important to note that accountability plays a critical role as the key indicators provide mere guidance, however, the assignment of roles and the identification of goals to measure success is even more important.

More Reading