Servant Leadership

Written by

Kyle Beache

Published on

April 22, 2024
All ArticlesEmployee Relations and Conflict Management

In a fast-paced and competitive business world, leadership styles are constantly evolving. One style that has gained traction in recent years is servant leadership. This approach, which emphasises serving others first and leading second, has garnered attention for its ability to foster a positive work environment and drive organisational success.

Core principles of servant leadership

At the heart of servant leadership are several key principles that guide the leader’s actions and behaviours:

Empathy: Servant leaders strive to understand and empathise with others. They listen attentively to their team members, seeking to comprehend their perspectives, needs, and challenges. By showing empathy, leaders can build trust and create a supportive work environment.
Selflessness: Servant leaders prioritise the needs of others over their interests. They are willing to make personal sacrifices for the greater good of the team or organisation. This selfless attitude fosters a culture of collaboration and mutual respect.
Empowerment: Rather than micromanaging, servant leaders empower their team members to take ownership of their work and make decisions autonomously. They provide guidance and support, allowing individuals to develop their skills and grow professionally.
Vision: While servant leaders focus on serving others, they also have a clear vision for the future. They inspire and motivate their team by articulating a compelling vision and aligning the team’s efforts toward achieving common goals.
Accountability: Servant leaders hold themselves accountable for their actions and decisions. They are transparent in their communication and take responsibility for both successes and failures. This accountability sets a positive example for others to follow.
At its core, servant leadership is about putting the needs of others ahead of one’s own. This concept may seem counterintuitive in a world where leadership is often equated with authority and power. However, proponents of servant leadership argue that by serving others, leaders can create a more engaged and motivated workforce, leading to improved performance and higher levels of satisfaction among employees.

One of the key principles of servant leadership is empathy. Servant leaders strive to understand the perspectives and feelings of their team members, creating a sense of trust and collaboration. By showing empathy, leaders can build stronger relationships with employees, leading to a more cohesive and productive team.
Another important aspect is empowerment. Rather than micromanaging, servant leaders empower their members to make decisions and take ownership of their work. This autonomy not only leads to higher levels of job satisfaction but encourages creativity and innovation.


While servant leadership is widely praised for its many benefits, like any approach, it also has drawbacks and challenges. Here are some potential cons:
Perceived weakness: In environments where traditional leadership styles are more common, servant leadership may be perceived as weak or ineffective. Some may view leaders who prioritise serving others as lacking the assertiveness or decisiveness needed to lead effectively. To ensure perceived weakness is mitigated, servant leaders can maintain authority by setting clear expectations, providing feedback, and making tough decisions when necessary.
Time-consuming: Servant leadership can be time-consuming, as it often involves listening to and addressing the needs of team members individually. This approach may be challenging for leaders who are already pressed for time or managing large teams. Servant leaders will have to prioritise tasks and delegate effectively to ensure serving others does not detract from overall goals.
Misalignment with organisational goals: In some cases, the emphasis on serving others may conflict with the organisation’s overall goals and objectives. Leaders must strike a balance between meeting the needs of their team and achieving the organisation’s strategic priorities.
Difficulty in holding others accountable: Servant leaders prioritise building strong relationships with their team, which can make it challenging to hold individuals accountable for their performance or behaviour. This reluctance to enforce consequences can potentially hinder team effectiveness. As such, leaders need to clearly articulate organisational goals and how individual needs will align with these goals, finding a balance.
Risk of burnout: Servant leaders may be at risk of burnout if they prioritise the needs of others to the detriment of their well-being. It’s important to establish boundaries and practice self-care to avoid this potential pitfall.
Decision-making: Consensus-based decision-making, common in servant leadership, can be slow and inefficient. Servant leaders should use a combination of consensus-building and decisive leadership to ensure timely and effective decisions.
Not suitable for every situation: While servant leadership can be effective in many contexts, there may be situations where a more directive or authoritative leadership style is necessary. Leaders must be adaptable and able to assess which approach is appropriate.

Servant leadership was first introduced by Robert K Greenleaf in the 1970s and has since been adopted by a growing number of organisations. International companies such as Starbucks, Southwest Airlines and Whole Foods have embraced servant leadership principles and seen positive results in employee engagement and organisational performance.

In conclusion, servant leadership represents a paradigm shift in modern leadership. By prioritising the needs of others and leading with empathy and humility, servant leaders can create a more inclusive and productive work environment. As more organisations recognise the benefits of servant leadership, it is likely to become an increasingly prominent approach to leadership in the years to come. Although servant leadership has many benefits, it also has challenges. Leaders considering adopting this approach should be aware of these drawbacks and take steps to mitigate them.

More Reading